firecrawlvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 196 246 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 353 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 353 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with