HuginnvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Huginn, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with