LightpandavsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lightpanda | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Browser Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 37 085 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +284 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.0.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Zig | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 79/100 for Lightpanda, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Lightpanda is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).
Lightpanda details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Lightpanda, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with