firecrawlvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| firecrawl | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Web Scraping | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 196 454 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 111 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | apps/go-sdk/v1.15.0 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
firecrawl scores 91/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Torollo ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for firecrawl.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; firecrawl needs more configuration.
firecrawl is growing faster right now (+12 111 stars in 30 days).
firecrawl details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep firecrawl, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with