Crawl4AIvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Crawl4AI | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Web Scraping | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 86 470 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 250 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.9.5 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Crawl4AI scores 86/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Torollo ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Crawl4AI.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; Crawl4AI needs more configuration.
Crawl4AI is growing faster right now (+2 250 stars in 30 days).
Crawl4AI details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep Crawl4AI, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with