Feynmanvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Feynman | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 10 039 | 93 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +1 271 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.5.60 · 29 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 69/100 for Feynman, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 271 stars in 30 days).
Feynman details →uptime-kuma details →