faasvsPayload CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | Payload CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 45 561 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +649 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 20 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).
faas details →Payload CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep Payload CMS, compare it with