faasvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 92 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +57 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 35 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for faas.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).
faas details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with