ezbookkeepingvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ezbookkeeping | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 863 | 118 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +215 | +5 910 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 71/100 for ezbookkeeping, so it is the safer default.
ezbookkeeping ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 910 stars in 30 days).
ezbookkeeping details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep ezbookkeeping, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with