ActualvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 29 830 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +715 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Actual, so it is the safer default.
Actual ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Actual details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with