everydocs-corevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted Document Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| everydocs-core | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #33 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 429 | 95 425 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +2 408 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 46/100 for everydocs-core, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for everydocs-core.
If you want the quickest setup, everydocs-core is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 408 stars in 30 days).
everydocs-core details →Stirling-PDF details →All Document Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep everydocs-core, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with