EvergreenvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Evergreen | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Library Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 92 781 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +57 840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 51/100 for Evergreen, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Evergreen.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Evergreen needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 840 stars in 30 days).
Evergreen details →OmniVoice-Studio details →
Swap a project
Keep Evergreen, compare it with
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with