EvergreenvsKoha
Two self-hosted Library Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Evergreen | Koha | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Library Management | #1 of 4 in Library Management |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 596 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Koha scores 61/100 against 51/100 for Evergreen, so it is the safer default.
Koha is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
Evergreen details →Koha details →All Library Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep Evergreen, compare it with
Keep Koha, compare it with