EvergreenvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Evergreen | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Library Management | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 51/100 for Evergreen, so it is the safer default.
Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Evergreen.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Evergreen needs more configuration.
Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+132 stars in 30 days).
Evergreen details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Evergreen, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with