ERPNextvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 40 702 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 202 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 71 | 31 |
| Latest release | v13-baseline · 22 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 71 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 202 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with