ERPNextvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 40 708 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 208 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 72 | 11 |
| Latest release | v15.124.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 72 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 208 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with