ERPNextvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ERPNext | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 40 731 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 200 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ERPNext scores 85/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.
ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 200 stars in 30 days).
ERPNext details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep ERPNext, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with