EntevsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 29 712 | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +667 | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 31 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 81/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 30 for Ente.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+667 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with