EntevsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ente | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 29 731 | 1 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +671 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 52 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
Ente scores 82/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 30 for Ente.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.
Ente is growing faster right now (+671 stars in 30 days).
Ente details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →
Swap a project
Keep Ente, compare it with
Keep qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), compare it with