qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 759 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 7 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →Stash details →