elasticsearchvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| elasticsearch | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Search Engines | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 78 420 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +451 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 32 | 15 |
| Latest release | v9.5.5 · 6 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
elasticsearch scores 83/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
elasticsearch ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; elasticsearch needs more configuration.
elasticsearch is growing faster right now (+451 stars in 30 days).
elasticsearch details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep elasticsearch, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with