HiClawvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 35 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +529 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →qdrant details →