HiClawvsmilvus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | milvus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 46 513 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +270 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.6.26 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
milvus scores 82/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
milvus ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; milvus needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →milvus details →