EDAvsRedash
Two self-hosted Business Intelligence projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EDA | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 28 851 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 2 |
| Latest release | edalitics-3.1.1 · 25 Jun 2026 | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 50/100 for EDA, so it is the safer default.
EDA ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, EDA is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.
Redash is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).
EDA details →Redash details →All Business Intelligence projects →
Swap a project
Keep EDA, compare it with
Keep Redash, compare it with