EDAvsMetabase
Two self-hosted Business Intelligence projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EDA | Metabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 49 904 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +506 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 30 |
| Latest release | edalitics-3.1.1 · 25 Jun 2026 | v0.64.1 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
Metabase scores 83/100 against 50/100 for EDA, so it is the safer default.
Metabase ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for EDA.
If you want the quickest setup, EDA is easier to run; Metabase needs more configuration.
Metabase is growing faster right now (+506 stars in 30 days).
EDA details →Metabase details →All Business Intelligence projects →
Swap a project
Keep EDA, compare it with
Keep Metabase, compare it with