ecowitt2mqttvsNode RED
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ecowitt2mqtt | Node RED | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 10 in IoT | #1 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 299 | 23 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Node RED scores 81/100 against 49/100 for ecowitt2mqtt, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ecowitt2mqtt.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; ecowitt2mqtt needs more configuration.
Node RED is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
ecowitt2mqtt details →Node RED details →
Swap a project
Keep ecowitt2mqtt, compare it with
Keep Node RED, compare it with