Easy!Appointmentsvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Easy!Appointments | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 4 463 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | 1.6.1 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 67/100 for Easy!Appointments, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Easy!Appointments.
If you want the quickest setup, Easy!Appointments is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
Easy!Appointments details →temporal details →