Qinglongvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Qinglong | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 34 in Task Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 20 027 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
Qinglong details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Qinglong, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with