e2bvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 595 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 11 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →TradingAgents details →All AI Agents projects →