Duplicativsrepliqate
Two self-hosted Backup projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Duplicati | repliqate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 46 in Backup | #40 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 15 172 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +152 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.4.0.1_stable_2026-10-07 · 7 Oct 2026 | v0.2.4 · 14 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C# | C |
Which one should you pick?
Duplicati scores 76/100 against 42/100 for repliqate, so it is the safer default.
Duplicati ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for repliqate.
If you want the quickest setup, Duplicati is easier to run; repliqate needs more configuration.
Duplicati is growing faster right now (+152 stars in 30 days).
Duplicati details →repliqate details →All Backup projects →