Stalwart Mail Servervsurl-to-png
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stalwart Mail Server | url-to-png | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 16 in Mail Server | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 15 470 | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +667 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-SEL | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stalwart Mail Server scores 79/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.
Stalwart Mail Server ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.
If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Stalwart Mail Server needs more configuration.
Stalwart Mail Server is growing faster right now (+667 stars in 30 days).
Stalwart Mail Server details →url-to-png details →
Swap a project
Keep Stalwart Mail Server, compare it with
Keep url-to-png, compare it with