drivebasevseverydocs-core
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drivebase | everydocs-core | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 34 in File Management | #33 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 594 | 429 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.0.0 · 3 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
drivebase scores 51/100 against 46/100 for everydocs-core, so it is the safer default.
drivebase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for everydocs-core.
If you want the quickest setup, everydocs-core is easier to run; drivebase needs more configuration.
everydocs-core is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
drivebase details →everydocs-core details →
Swap a project
Keep drivebase, compare it with
Keep everydocs-core, compare it with