drawdbvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drawdb | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Diagramming | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 40 164 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +466 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
drawdb scores 80/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, drawdb is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
drawdb is growing faster right now (+466 stars in 30 days).
drawdb details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep drawdb, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with