ChartDBvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChartDB | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 23 027 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +77 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.20.1 · 7 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
ChartDB scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
ChartDB ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, ChartDB is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
ChartDB details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep ChartDB, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with