drawdbvsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| drawdb | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Diagramming | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 40 176 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +478 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
drawdb scores 80/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for drawdb.
If you want the quickest setup, drawdb is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.
drawdb is growing faster right now (+478 stars in 30 days).
drawdb details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep drawdb, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with