dokployvsQuickStack
Two self-hosted Heroku alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dokploy | QuickStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #7 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 38 092 | 364 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +606 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | 1.0.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
dokploy scores 80/100 against 52/100 for QuickStack, so it is the safer default.
dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QuickStack.
If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; QuickStack needs more configuration.
dokploy is growing faster right now (+606 stars in 30 days).
dokploy details →QuickStack details → All Heroku alternatives →