CapRovervsQuickStack
Two self-hosted Heroku alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CapRover | QuickStack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #7 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 15 194 | 364 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.15.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | 1.0.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
CapRover scores 71/100 against 52/100 for QuickStack, so it is the safer default.
QuickStack ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for CapRover.
CapRover is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
CapRover details →QuickStack details → All Heroku alternatives →