DocsvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Docs | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 957 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +98 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 6 |
| Latest release | v6.0.4 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Docs scores 75/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Docs ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Docs details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Docs, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with