AFFiNE Community EditionvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AFFiNE Community Edition | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 73 949 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 003 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.27.4 · 17 Aug 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AFFiNE Community Edition scores 83/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for AFFiNE Community Edition.
If you want the quickest setup, AFFiNE Community Edition is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
AFFiNE Community Edition is growing faster right now (+1 003 stars in 30 days).
AFFiNE Community Edition details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep AFFiNE Community Edition, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with