DiscoursevsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Discourse | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 48 029 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.
If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Discourse is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
Discourse details →QGIS Web Client details →