MisskeyvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Misskey | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Fediverse | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 11 366 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Misskey scores 74/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Misskey.
If you want the quickest setup, Misskey is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
Misskey is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Misskey details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep Misskey, compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with