DietPivsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DietPi | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Operating System | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 6 369 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +71 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 6 |
| Latest release | v10.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 71/100 for DietPi, so it is the safer default.
DietPi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, DietPi is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
DietPi details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep DietPi, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with