Tube ArchivistvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with