Tube ArchivistvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with