deer-flowvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 84 551 | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 630 | +5 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow and TradingAgents score the same (86/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →TradingAgents details →All AI Agents projects →