deer-flowvsPrint Farm Manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | Print Farm Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 84 615 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 667 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.0.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 47/100 for Print Farm Manager, so it is the safer default.
deer-flow ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Print Farm Manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Print Farm Manager is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 667 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →Print Farm Manager details →