deer-flowvsOtoDock
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| deer-flow | OtoDock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 209 in AI Agents | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 84 574 | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 653 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
deer-flow scores 86/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.
OtoDock ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for deer-flow.
If you want the quickest setup, OtoDock is easier to run; deer-flow needs more configuration.
deer-flow is growing faster right now (+1 653 stars in 30 days).
deer-flow details →OtoDock details →All AI Agents projects →