DeepSeek Harnessvszoneless
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | zoneless | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 10 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 | 573 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v0.1.0 · 23 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for zoneless, so it is the safer default.
zoneless ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →zoneless details →