DeepSeek Harnessvs心潮动态心智系统
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | 心潮动态心智系统 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 217 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.
心潮动态心智系统 ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →心潮动态心智系统 details →All AI Agents projects →