DeepSeek Harnessvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-openwakeword ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →wyoming-openwakeword details →